you have a point.  but while it's true it's not completely general, i'm
personally only interested in a library of components. and at present
components delivered by maven.


francisco treacy-2 wrote:
> 
> interesting post.
> there's also
> http://www.nabble.com/Open-wicket-component-collection-anywhere--td19450431.html
> 
> however sometimes 'automatic' doesn't work simply because people don't
> mavenize their projects, it's just a bunch of files thrown in an svn
> repo, or even a snippet of code. and you can't force them to use a
> certain container, maven plugin, etc. imagine when it doesn't fit (a
> snippet or an ide plugin).
> 
> depending on the projects' structure i'll take a look and try to find
> the way to automatically pick up as much as possible.
> 
> i'm thinking of publishing wickethub's source code so it feels more of
> a community project.
> 
> francisco
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Maarten Bosteels
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Locke
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> oh yeah, there's a post where we started figuring out some details about
>>> how
>>> this would work somewhere on this list
>>
>>
>> Here it is :
>> http://www.nabble.com/idea:-automatic-component-repo-to17979177.html
>>
>> Maarten
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan Locke wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > this is cool, although i still think this should be auto-updated
>>> through
>>> a
>>> > maven registry crawler. if everyone put the right meta information in
>>> > their wicket jars, this resource registry would be entirely automatic,
>>> > always fresh, running demos, etc...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > francisco treacy-2 wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> i came up with an idea during the last weeks, having some trouble
>>> >> finding wicket resources.
>>> >>
>>> >> although we have wicketstuff (which is great, and even more now with
>>> >> jeremy's awesome job of reorganizing it)  i feel there are still lots
>>> >> of components, plugins or tools that are lost in cyberspace. thought
>>> >> it would be neat to keep a sort of "registry" with useful information
>>> >> for wicket developers.
>>> >>
>>> >> so i decided to quickly put some bits together from an old project
>>> and
>>> >> rebaptised it as "the wicket hub" - a simple prototype @
>>> >> http://wickethub.org.
>>> >> it's meant to be flexible, so except for the title there are no
>>> >> required fields when you add/edit a "module". there are already some
>>> >> examples.
>>> >>
>>> >> let me know what you think about features, its relation with
>>> >> wicketstuff and if it's usable, etc. or even if the whole thing makes
>>> >> no sense - any suggestions appreciated.
>>> >>
>>> >> francisco
>>> >>
>>> >> ps: goes without saying, but [disclaimer: it's completely
>>> >> experimental] and be aware the place it's hosted is more like a
>>> >> shoebox than a server :)
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/wickethub.org-tp20995774p21022750.html
>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/wickethub.org-tp20995774p21035901.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to