interesting post. there's also http://www.nabble.com/Open-wicket-component-collection-anywhere--td19450431.html
however sometimes 'automatic' doesn't work simply because people don't mavenize their projects, it's just a bunch of files thrown in an svn repo, or even a snippet of code. and you can't force them to use a certain container, maven plugin, etc. imagine when it doesn't fit (a snippet or an ide plugin). depending on the projects' structure i'll take a look and try to find the way to automatically pick up as much as possible. i'm thinking of publishing wickethub's source code so it feels more of a community project. francisco On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Maarten Bosteels <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Locke > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> oh yeah, there's a post where we started figuring out some details about >> how >> this would work somewhere on this list > > > Here it is : > http://www.nabble.com/idea:-automatic-component-repo-to17979177.html > > Maarten > >> >> >> >> Jonathan Locke wrote: >> > >> > >> > this is cool, although i still think this should be auto-updated through >> a >> > maven registry crawler. if everyone put the right meta information in >> > their wicket jars, this resource registry would be entirely automatic, >> > always fresh, running demos, etc... >> > >> > >> > francisco treacy-2 wrote: >> >> >> >> i came up with an idea during the last weeks, having some trouble >> >> finding wicket resources. >> >> >> >> although we have wicketstuff (which is great, and even more now with >> >> jeremy's awesome job of reorganizing it) i feel there are still lots >> >> of components, plugins or tools that are lost in cyberspace. thought >> >> it would be neat to keep a sort of "registry" with useful information >> >> for wicket developers. >> >> >> >> so i decided to quickly put some bits together from an old project and >> >> rebaptised it as "the wicket hub" - a simple prototype @ >> >> http://wickethub.org. >> >> it's meant to be flexible, so except for the title there are no >> >> required fields when you add/edit a "module". there are already some >> >> examples. >> >> >> >> let me know what you think about features, its relation with >> >> wicketstuff and if it's usable, etc. or even if the whole thing makes >> >> no sense - any suggestions appreciated. >> >> >> >> francisco >> >> >> >> ps: goes without saying, but [disclaimer: it's completely >> >> experimental] and be aware the place it's hosted is more like a >> >> shoebox than a server :) >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/wickethub.org-tp20995774p21022750.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
