2009/3/25 Martin Funk <mafulaf...@googlemail.com>: > > Am 25.03.2009 um 10:17 schrieb nino martinez wael: > >> The problem with wicket stuff have been cleared up a bit, the part about >> which projects are dead and not.. Those in wicketstuff-core are alive, and >> if they become incompatible with the current version of wicket they will >> be >> kicked.. > > are they? I mean alive.
AFAIK inmethod are not part of wicketstuff core > Locking here: > http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/viewLog.html?buildId=3486&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=bt35 > I'd say it's at least not compiling no more. > > Could someone please fix that? > > mf > >> >> >> 2009/3/25 Maarten Bosteels <mbosteels....@gmail.com> >> >>> Hi Ryan, >>> >>> I added you to the Project Members, so feel free to commit your examples. >>> Unfortunately, until now I haven't had time to work on it myself >>> >>> The idea was to let the code mature in >>> http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ >>> and maybe move it to wicket-stuff later on. >>> >>> Maybe we should move it to wicket-stuff already. >>> My main problem with wicket-stuff is/was that it's not always very clear >>> which projects are still alive and maintained and which are practically >>> dead. And at the time, wicket-stuff had some problems with continuous >>> integration, IIRC. >>> >>> Les, what do you think ? >>> We should change the project name to wicket-ki anyway. >>> >>> regards, >>> Maarten >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, nino martinez wael < >>> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah I've for one always been very pro for wicketstuff.. It's nice >>> >>> keeping >>>> >>>> things in one place.. Plus as you write if we share a somewhat similar >>>> structure it's potentially easier to maintain.. >>>> >>>> 2009/3/24 Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> Hi- >>>>> >>>>> I've been looking to integrate a complex security model with wicket -- >>>>> jsecurity seems really good. I tried messing with: >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ >>>>> >>>>> This appears to be a starting place, but does not have any running >>>> >>>> example. >>>>> >>>>> In an effort to get things running (and learn JSecurity) i took that + >>>>> wicket-auth-roles and tried to make a functioning core + example. I've >>>> >>>> got >>>>> >>>>> something running and would love to share it... >>>>> >>>>> Should I post this to the google code site? >>>>> >>>>> It makes more sense (to me) if we keep it in the wicketstuff repos -- >>>> >>>> that >>>>> >>>>> way we get the benefit of Jeremy's work to make wickettuff-core much >>>>> cleaner. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Ryan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
