I run Continuum on my server and just started receiving notifications two days ago that inmethod grid was not compiling. It showed up right after the commit of this ki security stuff.
I haven't looked at it yet, hoping that someone who was working with ki security or inmethod would do so. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Martin Funk <mafulaf...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > Am 25.03.2009 um 10:17 schrieb nino martinez wael: > > The problem with wicket stuff have been cleared up a bit, the part about >> which projects are dead and not.. Those in wicketstuff-core are alive, and >> if they become incompatible with the current version of wicket they will >> be >> kicked.. >> > are they? I mean alive. > Locking here: > > http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/viewLog.html?buildId=3486&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=bt35 > I'd say it's at least not compiling no more. > > Could someone please fix that? > > mf > > > >> >> 2009/3/25 Maarten Bosteels <mbosteels....@gmail.com> >> >> Hi Ryan, >>> >>> I added you to the Project Members, so feel free to commit your examples. >>> Unfortunately, until now I haven't had time to work on it myself >>> >>> The idea was to let the code mature in >>> http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ >>> and maybe move it to wicket-stuff later on. >>> >>> Maybe we should move it to wicket-stuff already. >>> My main problem with wicket-stuff is/was that it's not always very clear >>> which projects are still alive and maintained and which are practically >>> dead. And at the time, wicket-stuff had some problems with continuous >>> integration, IIRC. >>> >>> Les, what do you think ? >>> We should change the project name to wicket-ki anyway. >>> >>> regards, >>> Maarten >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, nino martinez wael < >>> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah I've for one always been very pro for wicketstuff.. It's nice >>>> >>> keeping >>> >>>> things in one place.. Plus as you write if we share a somewhat similar >>>> structure it's potentially easier to maintain.. >>>> >>>> 2009/3/24 Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> Hi- >>>>> >>>>> I've been looking to integrate a complex security model with wicket -- >>>>> jsecurity seems really good. I tried messing with: >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/ >>>>> >>>>> This appears to be a starting place, but does not have any running >>>>> >>>> example. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> In an effort to get things running (and learn JSecurity) i took that + >>>>> wicket-auth-roles and tried to make a functioning core + example. I've >>>>> >>>> got >>>> >>>>> something running and would love to share it... >>>>> >>>>> Should I post this to the google code site? >>>>> >>>>> It makes more sense (to me) if we keep it in the wicketstuff repos -- >>>>> >>>> that >>>> >>>>> way we get the benefit of Jeremy's work to make wickettuff-core much >>>>> cleaner. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Ryan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
