Oh, I have no problem doing that. The issue is getting the other PMC members to agree to it. I had ProxyFactory set up as an interface in the first place and they strongly suggested that I change it to a class.
As for the SFL4J-likeness request, I don't think that's too tough. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Johan Compagner <[email protected]> wrote: > i am fully conviced that james can do all that. :) > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 19:31, James Carman > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok, ok. I get it. I get it. I've got a request in to make Commons >> Proxy more like SLF4J in that the implementation is "discoverable" at >> runtime. I personally agree with you. I also think ProxyFactory >> should be made an interface, not a concrete class. What I would do is >> jack up the release number if I ever wanted to change it. >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Johan Compagner <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > you mean the PropertyModel based on proxies (there is an issue in jira >> for >> > that) >> > >> > I have some code working yes. But the problem is that commons-proxy isnt >> > good enough yet to use >> > (because we in wicket need to make a decision which proxy to use up >> front) >> > >> > Or i could just go for the default jdk proxy. >> > >> > the best thing was if commons proxy would work like slf4j >> > >> > johan >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 14:44, nino martinez wael < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> This again makes me wonder how the cglibproxy thing are comming along? >> >> >> >> 2009/3/25 Erik van Oosten <[email protected]>: >> >> > Haha, yes ugly, but very clear. >> >> > >> >> > In any case, using bind (as on CompoundPropertyModel) works as well. >> That >> >> > way you can use proper component ids in combination with XPath-like >> >> property >> >> > expression. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Johan Compagner wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> do you really use such ugly id's? :) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 15:15, Erik van Oosten <[email protected] >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Interesting. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I think we have something similar. We do stuff like >> >> >>> new TextField("/addresses/address[1]/street") >> >> >>> and this will automatically bind the text field to a node in the XML >> >> >>> document that was attached to the form. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Regards, >> >> >>> Erik. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Jan Kriesten wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I did something like that with XML specifying the form and having a >> >> >>>> ElementModel >> >> >>>> binding the form elements to JDOM nodes. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Best regards, --- Jan. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Erik van Oosten >> >> > http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
