you mean the PropertyModel based on proxies (there is an issue in jira for that)
I have some code working yes. But the problem is that commons-proxy isnt good enough yet to use (because we in wicket need to make a decision which proxy to use up front) Or i could just go for the default jdk proxy. the best thing was if commons proxy would work like slf4j johan On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 14:44, nino martinez wael < [email protected]> wrote: > This again makes me wonder how the cglibproxy thing are comming along? > > 2009/3/25 Erik van Oosten <[email protected]>: > > Haha, yes ugly, but very clear. > > > > In any case, using bind (as on CompoundPropertyModel) works as well. That > > way you can use proper component ids in combination with XPath-like > property > > expression. > > > > > > > > Johan Compagner wrote: > >> > >> do you really use such ugly id's? :) > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 15:15, Erik van Oosten <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Interesting. > >>> > >>> I think we have something similar. We do stuff like > >>> new TextField("/addresses/address[1]/street") > >>> and this will automatically bind the text field to a node in the XML > >>> document that was attached to the form. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Erik. > >>> > >>> > >>> Jan Kriesten wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I did something like that with XML specifying the form and having a > >>>> ElementModel > >>>> binding the form elements to JDOM nodes. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, --- Jan. > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > -- > > Erik van Oosten > > http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
