This again makes me wonder how the cglibproxy thing are comming along?
2009/3/25 Erik van Oosten <e.vanoos...@grons.nl>:
> Haha, yes ugly, but very clear.
>
> In any case, using bind (as on CompoundPropertyModel) works as well. That
> way you can use proper component ids in combination with XPath-like property
> expression.
>
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>>
>> do you really use such ugly id's? :)
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 15:15, Erik van Oosten <e.vanoos...@grons.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Interesting.
>>>
>>> I think we have something similar. We do stuff like
>>> new TextField("/addresses/address[1]/street")
>>> and this will automatically bind the text field to a node in the XML
>>> document that was attached to the form.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Erik.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jan Kriesten wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I did something like that with XML specifying the form and having a
>>>> ElementModel
>>>> binding the form elements to JDOM nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, --- Jan.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> --
> Erik van Oosten
> http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
