upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.

Martijn

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
> from the top of my head :)
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Igor,
>>    I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a known
>> bug?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
>> <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
>>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
>>>
>>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
>>> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi!,
>>> >    I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
>>> >
>>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and several
>>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked boxes
>>> are
>>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
>>> >       I verified several times if there was a problem between models and
>>> It
>>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw, according to
>>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know how to
>>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some people
>>> asking
>>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
>>> >
>>> > (check.class)
>>> >        if (group.hasRawInput())
>>> >        {
>>> >            final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
>>> >
>>> >            if (input != null)
>>> >            {
>>> >                for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
>>> >                {
>>> >                    if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
>>> >                    {
>>> >                        tag.put("checked", "checked");
>>> >                    }
>>> >                }
>>> >            }
>>> >        }
>>> >        else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
>>> >        {
>>> >            tag.put("checked", "checked");
>>> >        }
>>> >
>>> > Thanks in advance.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Fernando Wermus.
>>> >
>>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Wermus.
>>
>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to