Hi,
    Finally I got solved the problem and I wanna share with you. My
checkgroup in the wizard panel werent setting up the setReuseItem in the
ListView.... It was hard to realize but I get it.



On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com
> wrote:

> Please file a JIRA at the URL below [1].  The most effective issues
> are ones that are submitted with a patch.  To make it even more
> effective, please run all tests against the patched codebase (run "mvn
> clean test") and notate that you did so when you submit your patch.
>
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Fernando Wermus
> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >    I moved to wicket 1.3.6, the lastest before 1.4, without any luck.
> What
> > I did next, it was to cut the code that was bother me and It is working
> now.
> > Of course, I am afraid that this could have colateral effects. This is
> the
> > code,
> >
> >        if (group.hasRawInput())
> >        {
> >            final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
> >
> >            if (input != null)
> >            {
> >                for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> >                {
> >                    if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> >                    {
> >                        tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >                    }
> >                }
> >            }
> >        }
> >
> > If I liked to write a Jira with an example, What would I do? I've never
> done
> > this before.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> upgrading to a newer version is always preferred as a first measure.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > you can search jira for all known issues, i dont remember all of them
> >> > from the top of my head :)
> >> >
> >> > -igor
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Fernando Wermus
> >> > <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Igor,
> >> >>    I can move to a newer wicket version. Do you know if this is a
> known
> >> >> bug?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> if you care to submit a quickstart that demonstrates this in a jira
> >> >>> issue im sure someone will fix it relatively quickly.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> of course patches are applied even quicker :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -igor
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Fernando Wermus
> >> >>> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi!,
> >> >>> >    I am facing a problem that I don't know how to face.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I have a wizard several steps. One of them has a checkGroup and
> >> several
> >> >>> > check. If I go to a step back and then a step foward, the checked
> >> boxes
> >> >>> are
> >> >>> > lost. The same happens when a required field is not completed.
> >> >>> >       I verified several times if there was a problem between
> models
> >> and
> >> >>> It
> >> >>> > is not the case. What I found is that the checkgroup is raw,
> >> according to
> >> >>> > check impl, and it doesn't compare the second elseif. I don't know
> >> how to
> >> >>> > manage this situation and I looked up in Google and I saw some
> people
> >> >>> asking
> >> >>> > about the same problem. I am using wicket 1.3.0.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > (check.class)
> >> >>> >        if (group.hasRawInput())
> >> >>> >        {
> >> >>> >            final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >            if (input != null)
> >> >>> >            {
> >> >>> >                for (int i = 0; i < input.length; i++)
> >> >>> >                {
> >> >>> >                    if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
> >> >>> >                    {
> >> >>> >                        tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >> >>> >                    }
> >> >>> >                }
> >> >>> >            }
> >> >>> >        }
> >> >>> >        else if (collection.contains(getModelObject()))
> >> >>> >        {
> >> >>> >            tag.put("checked", "checked");
> >> >>> >        }
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Thanks in advance.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Fernando Wermus.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Fernando Wermus.
> >> >>
> >> >> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> >> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fernando Wermus.
> >
> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus

Reply via email to