Igor, thanks very much for your input and insight. I really mean it. All the best.
--- On Thu, 7/2/09, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Large internet rich UI Wicket websites? > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Date: Thursday, July 2, 2009, 2:35 PM > lets say the entire backend of amazon > is written in wicket. would you > consider that to be a large application? how would you ever > know that > it was written in wicket? people who work on projects like > these do > not often go, or most times are not even allowed, to boast > on some > public mailing list. > > wicket is best suited for very complex uis, and such uis > are not often > suited for public websites - whose mission is to make the > experience > as simple as possible for the user. not saying that it > cannot be done. > > i think if this is some sort of a "criteria" for choosing a > framework > you should probably go with servlets. there are some very > very large > sites out there written in pure jsp and servlets. good > luck. > > -igor > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, David Chang<david_q_zh...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Jeremy, thanks for your input. I don't quite > understand the side note in your reply. For a large website > such as Amazon to work, there should absolutely be different > technologies/tiers, tuning, security, and other > considerations. The basic question is whether a framework is > up to that task and whether there is evidence in reality. > > > > Still back to my original question, any there any > large Wicket website out there? Wicket people have to face > it, me too, if I am going to use it. > > > > > > --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> > wrote: > > > >> From: Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> > >> Subject: Re: Large internet rich UI Wicket > websites? > >> To: users@wicket.apache.org > >> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 4:08 PM > >> There are some large ones that have > >> been mentioned on the mailing > >> lists in the past - you can try searching Nabble - > they may > >> not be on > >> that page. > >> > >> As a side note, I find it funny how everyone > always > >> compares their > >> anticipated traffic with Amazon or eBay. I > worked at > >> eBay for quite > >> some time, and I know that you are not going to > run either > >> of those > >> sites with any framework straight out of the > box. I'm > >> not saying > >> Wicket can't scale to that size, I'm saying that > no > >> framework defaults > >> to being made for that size. Could eBay or > Amazon use > >> Wicket? Sure, > >> with the right techniques. Could your website > use > >> it? Yes, and > >> probably much easier. :) > >> > >> -- > >> Jeremy Thomerson > >> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM, David Chang<david_q_zh...@yahoo.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Martin, I looked at the list and it seems > none of them > >> meets what I said about large rich ui Wicket > website. Likely > >> I am ignorant. Please enlighten me. By large, I > mean > >> something similar or close to amazon.com or > ebay.com that > >> have a large number of concurrent users. Which > Wicket > >> website in your knowledge seems to the largest > one? > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > > >> > --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Martin Funk <mafulaf...@googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> From: Martin Funk <mafulaf...@googlemail.com> > >> >> Subject: Re: Large internet rich UI > Wicket > >> websites? > >> >> To: users@wicket.apache.org > >> >> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 3:21 PM > >> >> > >> >> Am 01.07.2009 um 20:11 schrieb David > Chang: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I am still learning Wicket. The more > I read > >> from > >> >> <<Wicket in Action>>, the > more I like > >> it. > >> >> > > >> >> > From the book, I know that companies > from > >> startups to > >> >> large-size ones such as IBM, Amazon, etc. > use > >> Wicket for > >> >> their projects, but I cannot find a list > of > >> specific larget > >> >> internet rich UI websites coded with > Wicket. Could > >> someone > >> >> help? > >> >> > > >> >> > The backgound for this request is > that we may > >> use > >> >> Wicket for a large highly-active > website. > >> >> maybe this helps: > >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/sites-using-wicket.html > >> >> mf > >> >> > > >> >> > Cheers! > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
