On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Reinhard
Nägele<reinhard.naeg...@mgm-tp.com> wrote:
> To me wicketstuff presents itself as some inofficial playground with lots of
> badly documented things in it.

It is.  Wicketstuff is open for anyone to join and basically do
whatever they want with it - so long as it has something to do with
Wicket.  There are many abandoned projects and proofs of concept
projects there.

> However, wicketstuff-core (which is not even
> listed on the wicketstuff wiki (except for a migration guide)) seems to have
> a somewhat more official character. May the latter be taken as a
> production-ready supplement to Wicket?

Last year I took on the task of trying to improve the organization of
wicketstuff by moving all of the most qualified projects into
wicketstuff core.  There's no guarantee of production-readiness.  The
goal was to get it where they could all be built with numbered
releases to match Wicket.  This is possible (I just built and deployed
1.4-rc7 last week).  I will try to keep a numbered release matching
every Wicket release - but some of the projects under it may be more
production ready / quality than others.

> I'd appreciate it if some
> restructuring and clarification came along with the upcoming 1.4 release.

Volunteers are always welcome!  It seems that most of the issues you
have are with wicketstuff (understandably) which should have no
reflection on Wicket's 1.4 release - it just so happens that some of
the same people are involved, but Wicket is the primary focus.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to