Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Ceki Gulcu <c...@qos.ch> wrote:
Anyway, my application handles a complex tree-like structure, with
almost all of the contents non-serializable and outside my control. I
don't think I can use a Loadable Detachable Model, because loading the
tree may take several minutes.
you would use an LDM per node - the LDM should load the object
represented by that node only, not the entire tree.
does that make sense?
LDM makes sense if you can detach data and then re-attach at a later
time. In my case, I can't re-attach data without potentially paying a
very severe penalty. (There is no datasource which can be queried for
my data, as my data is runtime data. I'd need to re-run tests to
re-acquire, which is pretty much nonsensical.)
-igor
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
