Someone should craft a very nice dilbert mashup for wicket ;) ** Martin
2010/1/8 Loritsch, Berin C. <[email protected]>: > "But why choose an inferior technology just because of its adoption > numbers?" > > The pointy haired bosses that do this believe in their heart of hearts > that if you choose the same technology everyone else is using that they > can turn thinking developers for mindless drones. It has more to do > with avoiding training costs and rational thought, and more to do with > trying to turn software development into an assembly line process. > Reality never fits this mold, but it doesn't stop the pointy haired boss > from trying. In this respect they are eternal optimists. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 4:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Help with Wicket Adoption Numbers > > Hi, > > We also had the same consideration when we chose Wicket. But why choose > an > inferior technology just because of it's Adoption Numbers? Also, Wicket > is > becoming more and more popular as people see the light :) > > Check out Jobs Trends (Relative Growth) here (JSF vs Struts vs Wicket): > http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Struts%2C+JSF%2C+Wicket&l=&relative=1 > > We have a couple of hundred customers and so far the feedback is great > both from our Developers and our Software Architects. Customers like > that > the GUIs are faster due to the simplicity of Ajax Adoption in Wicket. > > I also know that several large privately held companies in Sweden are > using Wicket, as well as large Government Agencies (e.g. the Swedish > Immigration Office). > > > Sincerely yours > Leo Erlandsson > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
