On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Alex Objelean <alex.objel...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > I don't want to insist to much, I'm not absurd, but we are technical > people. > Don't you think that any theorem should be proven? The least we can achieve > is to learn a new thing about how ITL are related to memory leaks. > > I know it isn't easy to prove, but aren't there enough tools to help us? Is > it really that hard to make a simple example with a worst case scenario to > check if the presumption is indeed valid? I know it is much simpler to do > nothing to avoid potential problems, but still do you find it a good way to > deal with problems? Don't you believe in presumption of innocence > principle? > > I don't want to bother the community, if there won't anybody willing to > prove the problem, eventually I will spend some time to bust the myth... > > I'd be happy to see you bust it. But, like you said - we are technical people - which is why we can postulate certain things without writing a complex test case to prove them. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
