On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Martin Makundi < martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > Has this been attempted before? Would it be a good idea to go at it? > Sure would help removing some boilerplate webmarkupcontainer code. > Existing jira issue for this? > At least I haven't seen one. > > ** > Martin > > 2010/11/9 Martin Makundi <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com>: > > Hi! > > > > Does <wicket:enclosure> have capability to > "setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag" ? > > > > What I mean is that when I have: > > <wicket:enclosure child="optional-field"> > > <tr> > > <td>optional content</td> > > <td><input type="text" wicket:id="optional-field"/></td> > > </tr> > > </wicket> > > > > If I set it invisible via ajax I cannot set it visible again. > > > > Instead, is there a way to do something like: > > > > > > <tr wicket:enclosure="child:optional-field"> > > <td>optional content</td> > > <td><input type="text" wicket:id="optional-field"/></td> > > </tr> > > > > So that it would automatically handle visible/hidden > > "setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag" flavour so that I can repaint a hidden > > element via ajax? > > > > @See > http://jawher.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/wicket-enclosures-and-ajax-no-no/ > > > > > > ** > > Martin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
