no ofcourse not
The label will then be gone because the body is gone.
so the output will be this
<html>
</html>
when the body container is not visible
if the label is not visible:
<html>
<body>
</body>
</html>
this solution you just can throw everything in the panel or webpage
that is the IComponentResolver for all its childs...
Just look at how the code works..
IF a component can't be found on its own parent the ComponentResolver
will ask all the parents which can be IComponentResolver to render the
child..
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 19:04, Martin Makundi
<martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> This does not really nest the components logically, does it?
>
> If you set get("body").setVisible(false) will the label remain visible?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2010/11/9 Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com>:
>> Why are we discussing here already that works in wicket 1.4 if you
>> really need it?
>>
>>
>> public class HelloWorld extends WebPage implements IComponentResolver {
>>
>> public HelloWorld()
>> {
>> add(new WebMarkupContainer("body"));
>> add(new Label("label","my label"));
>> }
>>
>> public boolean resolve(MarkupContainer container,
>> MarkupStream markupStream, ComponentTag tag) {
>>
>> Component component = get(tag.getId());
>> if (component != null)
>> {
>> component.render(markupStream);
>> return true;
>> }
>> return false;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> <html>
>> <body wicket:id="body">
>> <span wicket:id="label"></span>
>> </body>
>> </html>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 16:29, Frank Silbermann
>> <frank.silberm...@fedex.com> wrote:
>>> Progress is made by people who have understanding, not by the ignorant.
>>> You're not in a position to make suggestions about extending Wicket if
>>> you don't yet understand how to use the powers it already has.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:23 AM
>>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell
>>>
>>>> So instead of asking, "How can we make Wicket different so that my
>>>> problem will go away?" the proper question to try first is, "What is
>>> the
>>>> Wicket way of solving my problem?"
>>>
>>> That's not how proggress is made...
>>>
>>> **
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
