I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse domain).
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <bruno.bor...@gmail.com> wrote: > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.' > > Is this ok? > > *Bruno Borges* > www.brunoborges.com.br > +55 21 76727099 > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann > <harald.wellm...@gmx.de>wrote: > >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention to have >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have >> >> groupId: org.wicketstuff >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar >> version: 1.5 >> >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar >> >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention, while Apache >> Commons sticks with the old names. >> >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in parallel would >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs. >> >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts, once you osgify >> them. >> >> Regards, >> Harald >> >> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
