i think the groupid/artifactid do matter because some containers have bundle deployers that pull things from the maven repo...i think
-igor On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > The Maven artifact id is not important. > The name of the produced .jar is what matters, right ? > > Harald just said that there is a convention in OSGi world to work with > such named .jars (com.acme.blah) > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:31 PM, James Carman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> And repetitive >> >> Sent from my Android device. Please excuse typos and brevity. >> On Jun 30, 2011 11:12 AM, "Bruno Borges" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, me neither. That's why I asked. >>> >>> The preffix I'm using is "wicketstuff-", but Harald mentioned >>> "org.wicketstuff." >>> >>> I don't want to use that, it's too verbose. >>> >>> >>> *Bruno Borges* >>> www.brunoborges.com.br >>> +55 21 76727099 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, James Carman >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the >>>> artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse domain). >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.' >>>> > >>>> > Is this ok? >>>> > >>>> > *Bruno Borges* >>>> > www.brunoborges.com.br >>>> > +55 21 76727099 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann < >> [email protected] >>>> >wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention to have >>>> >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have >>>> >> >>>> >> groupId: org.wicketstuff >>>> >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar >>>> >> version: 1.5 >>>> >> >>>> >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar >>>> >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar >>>> >> >>>> >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention, while Apache >>>> >> Commons sticks with the old names. >>>> >> >>>> >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in parallel >> would >>>> >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs. >>>> >> >>>> >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts, once you >>>> osgify >>>> >> them. >>>> >> >>>> >> Regards, >>>> >> Harald >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org< >>>> [email protected]> >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >> > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
