Yes, me neither. That's why I asked. The preffix I'm using is "wicketstuff-", but Harald mentioned "org.wicketstuff."
I don't want to use that, it's too verbose. *Bruno Borges* www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:06 PM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote: > I haven't seen that syntax before of having the group id in the > artifact id, at least not with the longer group ids (reverse domain). > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruno Borges <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The preffix is 'wicketstuff-', not 'org.wicketstuff.' > > > > Is this ok? > > > > *Bruno Borges* > > www.brunoborges.com.br > > +55 21 76727099 > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Harald Wellmann <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> For Maven OSGi bundle artifacts, there is a quasi-convention to have > >> artifactId = Bundle-Symbolic name, so you would have > >> > >> groupId: org.wicketstuff > >> artifactId: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar > >> version: 1.5 > >> > >> Bundle-Symbolic-Name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar > >> JAR name: org.wicketstuff.foo.bar-1.5.**jar > >> > >> Apache Servicemix and Apache Aries use this convention, while Apache > >> Commons sticks with the old names. > >> > >> Having this naming scheme and the one Bruno suggested in parallel would > >> help to distinguish OSGi bundles from plain old JARs. > >> > >> Then again, that would mean you'd have to rename artifacts, once you > osgify > >> them. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Harald > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org< > [email protected]> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
