2011/10/7 Clint Checketts <checke...@gmail.com> > So what is the best way (official? permanent?) to link to a previous > response? > > In 6 months when someone has a similar question, what is the official way > to > link to previous answers? Equally, what is the best way to improve those > answers if the answer 6 months back worked at that time, but now is invalid > and a 'bad practice' due to wicket improvements? > > That is part of the problem. On the wiki, the pages are not tagged WICKET-1.4 or WICKET-1.5 so you don't know if you can use them.
Is's the same with mail. The avantage with a Q&A tool is that you tag, rename and edit the question and the answers. At the end you have a good question with the best answer and no duplicates. When you search something you just have to look at the tags to know if you can use the answer. > Folks so rarely use the mailing list archives ( > http://wicket.apache.org/help/email.html), (not easily searched!) I doubt > that is the solution. > > -Clint > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:32 AM, manuelbarzi <manuelba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > it sounds great, but why not fully concentrate on wicket. apache will > > adopt whatever magic-solution asa it'll be licence compliant, and > > affordable by resources and directives. > > > > for the moment this mailing list has been a very successful machine, > > and still has much to bring. outside, whatever wrapper (wicket-based > > or not, may be assembled to pull all posts, order and make them as far > > confortable-searcheable as low-patience eager-brains demand). > > > > as other expressed: markmail and nabble are pretty enough, and > > managing issues by mail - on smart or not phones - is simply a > > pleasure. > > . > > >
