As I am looking at them, I am not noticing either implementing the jQuery grid, much less the paging scrollbar. Am I overlooking it?
Brian Mulholland On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak <pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net> wrote: > I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious > again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations > and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always > just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs, > and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That > being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems > that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an > Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors > (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a > ListView). The latter (thus using Behaviors) is how I have always done > it, feels more natural to me, and is a lot more flexible. > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brian Mulholland" > <blmulholl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket. >> >> 1) Which is better and why? >> 2) Is one more established or better supported than the other? >> 3) Is one more full featured? >> >> What differentiates the two? >> >> Brian Mulholland >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
