On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hi, > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Nick Pratt <nbpr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Understood. > > > > Martin - (for my own curiousity now) would it be possible and would there > > be any benefit to replacing the default Wicket jQuery resource reference > > with a custom veil.js ResourceReference that also included the packaged > > Wicket jquery resource ref as a dependency (i.e. configure this all in > > Application.init() )? > > > > Yes. This will work as well. > > getJavaScriptLibrarySettings().setWicketAjaxReference(veilJsThatDependsOnOriginalWicketAjaxReference) > It's probably faster too... > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Marios Skounakis <msc...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I probably wasn't clear enough. > > > > > > Here's my case: > > > > > > BasePage.renderHead() adds veil.js as javascript resource reference. > > > > > > All my pages inherit from BasePage. But veil.js is only useful when a > > page > > > has wicket ajax. > > > > > > If I declare that veil.js has a dependency on jquery then the result is > > > that all pages get both veil.js and jquery. What I want is that pages > > that > > > don't have ajax (i.e. no Wicket-Ajax or Wicket-Event libraries) don't > > > include veil.js. I could do it on a per component basis but this would > be > > > cumbersome and error prone. So instead I used Martin's solution and > > > conditionally render veil.js only if the headerResponse renders > > > Wicket-Event. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Nick Pratt <nbpr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Then you're doing something odd :-) > > > > > > > > If you have dependencies like this: > > > > > > > > CustomComponent --> Custom JS Reference (and this is added in the > > public > > > > void renderHead( Component component, IHeaderResponse response ) > > method) > > > > --> Wicket's JQuery JS Reference > > > > > > > > Page A (no Ajax components or components depending on Wicket's jquery > > > ref) > > > > Page B --> CustomComponent (Page B being a copy of Page with a > single > > > > instance of your CustomComponent) > > > > > > > > When you load Page A, the JS will not be loaded. > > > > When you load Page B, both the Wicket JS and the custom JS will be > > added > > > to > > > > the page. > > > > > > > > If you are seeing Jquery being loaded in Page A then some component > on > > > that > > > > page requires the Wicket JS libraries and is causing it to be added. > > > > > > > > N > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Marios Skounakis <msc...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Martin, this worked well. > > > > > > > > > > Sebastien and Nick, I tried the solution with > > > > JQueryPluginResourceReference > > > > > but this indeed caused JQuery to be loaded in non ajax pages. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Martin Grigorov < > > mgrigo...@apache.org > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > You can create custom IHeaderResponseDecorator and by using > custom > > > > > > IHeaderResponse you can check for contributions > > > > > > of org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxJQueryResourceReference > > > > > > See > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples-6.0.x/resourceaggregation/?0 > > > > > > and > > http://wicketinaction.com/2012/07/wicket-6-resource-management/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Marios Skounakis < > > msc...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I'm not mistaken this will cause JQuery to be included > > whenever > > > my > > > > > js > > > > > > > reference is included. Effectively this will cause non-ajax > pages > > > to > > > > > load > > > > > > > javascript which applies only to ajax requests. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I want is the opposite: to not include my js reference > when > > > the > > > > > page > > > > > > > does not have any ajax. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Marios, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO the best way IMO is to make your js reference extending > > > > > > > > JQueryPluginResourceReference (wicket 6) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastien. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Marios Skounakis < > > > > msc...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a base page from which all my pages inherit. I want > to > > > > > > > > conditionally > > > > > > > > > include a javascript reference (header item) if the page > > > contains > > > > > an > > > > > > > ajax > > > > > > > > > component. The reference is a veil implementation based on > > > > BlockUI > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > redundant (and also causes a javascript error) if the page > > has > > > > not > > > > > > ajax > > > > > > > > > (and hence JQuery is not loaded). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > Marios > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
