Hi, Thanks for sharing your ideas!
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Francois Meillet < francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here are simple thoughts, > > modularity > what do you mean with that ? > servlet 4.0 / http 2.0 > I'm afraid it is too early for this. We can make sure Wicket works fine in a container supporting those but it is too early to require that. Servlet 4.0 is still in design process. Apache Tomcat didn't started implementing any features from it. I am not sure about the status in Jetty. I know that Undertow (the web container for JBoss Wildfly) supports HTTP 2.0 but I haven't heard of any Servlet 4.0 features. It will take us some time to release 8.0.0 but I think it will be too early to require Servlet 4.0 even then. > monitoring > I wanted to see how Wicket could provide some metrics ( https://dropwizard.github.io/metrics/3.1.0/) what else do you have in mind ? > server-sent events > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/blob/master/jdk-1.7-parent/wicket-html5-parent/wicket-html5/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/html5/eventsource/EventSourceResource.java provides this for 2 or 3 years now So far there were no bug reports for it. I guess no one uses it :-) > > new web design for https://wicket.apache.org I hope this will be ready for Wicket 7.0.0 ( https://github.com/dashorst/wicket-site, http://bitstorm.github.io/wicket-site/) @Martijn, @Andrea ? > > new wicket-examples > I've done some work at https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/3435-use-bootstrap-for-examples but it needs some love from someone with better CSS skills than me > better highlighting of WicketStuff modules on https://wicket.apache.org Andrea added some docs about some of the projects at http://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/wicketstuff.html Ideas for improvements can be filed at https://github.com/dashorst/wicket-site/issues > > > Using an online survey tool could be useful > good idea! > > see > https://java.net/downloads/javaee-spec/JavaEE8_Community_Survey_Results.pdf > > François Meillet > > > > > > > Le 7 mars 2015 à 22:23, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > Once 7.0.0 is released I think we should create a branch for Wicket 8 and > > see what we could benefit of Java 8. > > Having less verbose Wicket would be great! But not on any price! Lambdas > > are both harder to debug and produce bigger stack, so we should decide > > carefully. > > Other things to consider: > > - whether to use Optional for AjaxFallback** components. I don't remember > > the exact reason why Igor's Optional didn't make it, but we may > reevaluate > > - use the new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime (new Converters, etc.) > > - ??? > > > > We should also ask the community what they don't like in Wicket and what > > they would like to be added to make it better. > > > > Martin Grigorov > > Wicket Training and Consulting > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Francois Meillet < > > francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> > >> Is there any Wicket roadmap for the future (after version 7) ? > >> > >> What is your point of view about the Wicket's future ? > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> François Meillet > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
