I've created a new page in the Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+for+Wicket+8.0
Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for sharing your ideas! > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Francois Meillet < > francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here are simple thoughts, >> >> modularity >> > > what do you mean with that ? > > >> servlet 4.0 / http 2.0 >> > > I'm afraid it is too early for this. > We can make sure Wicket works fine in a container supporting those but it > is too early to require that. > Servlet 4.0 is still in design process. Apache Tomcat didn't started > implementing any features from it. I am not sure about the status in Jetty. > I know that Undertow (the web container for JBoss Wildfly) supports HTTP > 2.0 but I haven't heard of any Servlet 4.0 features. > It will take us some time to release 8.0.0 but I think it will be too > early to require Servlet 4.0 even then. > > >> monitoring >> > > I wanted to see how Wicket could provide some metrics ( > https://dropwizard.github.io/metrics/3.1.0/) > what else do you have in mind ? > > >> server-sent events >> > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/blob/master/jdk-1.7-parent/wicket-html5-parent/wicket-html5/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/html5/eventsource/EventSourceResource.java > provides this for 2 or 3 years now > So far there were no bug reports for it. I guess no one uses it :-) > > >> >> new web design for https://wicket.apache.org > > > I hope this will be ready for Wicket 7.0.0 ( > https://github.com/dashorst/wicket-site, > http://bitstorm.github.io/wicket-site/) > @Martijn, @Andrea ? > > >> >> new wicket-examples >> > > I've done some work at > https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/3435-use-bootstrap-for-examples but > it needs some love from someone with better CSS skills than me > > >> better highlighting of WicketStuff modules on https://wicket.apache.org > > > Andrea added some docs about some of the projects at > http://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/wicketstuff.html > Ideas for improvements can be filed at > https://github.com/dashorst/wicket-site/issues > > >> >> >> Using an online survey tool could be useful >> > > good idea! > > >> >> see >> https://java.net/downloads/javaee-spec/JavaEE8_Community_Survey_Results.pdf >> >> François Meillet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 7 mars 2015 à 22:23, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> a écrit : >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Once 7.0.0 is released I think we should create a branch for Wicket 8 >> and >> > see what we could benefit of Java 8. >> > Having less verbose Wicket would be great! But not on any price! Lambdas >> > are both harder to debug and produce bigger stack, so we should decide >> > carefully. >> > Other things to consider: >> > - whether to use Optional for AjaxFallback** components. I don't >> remember >> > the exact reason why Igor's Optional didn't make it, but we may >> reevaluate >> > - use the new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime (new Converters, etc.) >> > - ??? >> > >> > We should also ask the community what they don't like in Wicket and what >> > they would like to be added to make it better. >> > >> > Martin Grigorov >> > Wicket Training and Consulting >> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Francois Meillet < >> > francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> >> >> Is there any Wicket roadmap for the future (after version 7) ? >> >> >> >> What is your point of view about the Wicket's future ? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> François Meillet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
