On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:38:20 +0100, Thomas Mortagne wrote > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, rssh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > vmassol wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:31 PM, rssh wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Good day. > > >>> > > >>> I just download xwiki, and see, that it is not possible to set name > > >>> of default > > >>> database scheme other than 'xwiki'. (Becouse xwiki.tableName is > > >>> hardcoded in > > >>> SQL statements) > > >>> > > >>> Unfortunately. this means that it is hard to use xwiki as platform > > >>> for web > > >>> application, because usually we have situation 'one application/one > > >>> database > > >>> scheme' and want to use few applications (or few version of same > > >>> application) > > >>> simultaneously. > > >>> > > >>> Question: if I change this and wull create path for configurable > > >>> database > > >>> scheme name of main xwiki instance, would this patches be accepted > > >>> (?) or such > > >>> using is out of scope of interest for xwiki community ? > > >> > > >> We'd love that patch . However it's not an easy patch (you/we'll need > > >> to test it in lots of different conditions: XE, XEM, different > > >> databases). > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> -Vincent > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> users mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Any news on this? I did just run into this issue... > > > > For the record the jira issue is there and not implemented yet: > > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2006 > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > Need to clarify: patch is ready and need only in testing(from xwiki side, > > works for me) and committing. (As I see the main reason while it not > > committed yet -- lack of time of core xwiki committers, and also they just > > afraid touch low-level stuff [may be with some reason]) > > The problem was also that this patch add hql queries and almost > double them in non virtual mode: for each hibernate transaction it > execute a query to force switch to the configured database. But as > it's not worst than virtual mode which do exactly the same this to > ensure it works on the correct wiki/database. >
Yes. Also note, that you pay this price only if you use this feature. (I thinking about better solution, and can say that this is impossible without changing hibernate code.) > > > > Also note, that JIRA support voting, i. e. you can vote for this issue and > > may be this will help xwiki developers to prioritize this issue to be resolved > > in non-infinite time frame. > > > > > > > > -- > > Ruslan Shevchenko > > GradSoft. http://www.gradsoft.ua > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Ruslan Shevchenko GradSoft. http://www.gradsoft.ua _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
