Adriano Lopes wrote:
>  
> I have XWiki 1.1-milestone-2.3619 available in my business. I use it as a 
> repository for engineering technical information and legislation and as a 
> Blog.
>  
> My XWiki installation is the default one with the jetty container. I use 
> Vista x64 SP1.
>  
> The "xwiki_db.script" file is now over 3,5GB (mostly because I have many 
> attachments) and I have set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx2512m to be able to load XWiki. 
>  
> The process java.exe occupies 2,6GB of RAM memory. I have bought additional 
> RAM reaching a total of 6GB to be able to use the computer while XWiki is 
> loaded.
>  
> XWiki as become an important part of my business and all my co-workers love 
> to use it, so the information keeps growing.
>  
> I will most certainly reach the maximum RAM (8GB) of my computer and will 
> have to make large hardware investments if I am to continue using XWiki.
>  
> Is there a less resource-intensive way for Xwiki to store attachments or a 
> container more suitable for the way I use XWiki?
>  

Indeed, the most important thing is to change the underlying database 
system, as HSQL is not meant to store large databases.

As for the efficiency of storing attachments, this is a known problem 
which should be fixed soon.

-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to