> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:04:31 +0300> From: [email protected]> To:
> [email protected]> Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Less resource-intensive plataform
> for XWiki?> > Adriano Lopes wrote:>> >> I have XWiki 1.1-milestone-2.3619
> available in my business. I use it as a repository for engineering technical
> information and legislation and as a Blog.>> >> My XWiki installation is the
> default one with the jetty container. I use Vista x64 SP1.>> >> The
> "xwiki_db.script" file is now over 3,5GB (mostly because I have many
> attachments) and I have set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx2512m to be able to load XWiki. >>
> >> The process java.exe occupies 2,6GB of RAM memory. I have bought
> additional RAM reaching a total of 6GB to be able to use the computer while
> XWiki is loaded.>> >> XWiki as become an important part of my business and
> all my co-workers love to use it, so the information keeps growing.>> >> I
> will most certainly reach the maximum RAM (8GB) of my computer and will have
> to make large hardware investments if I am to continue using XWiki.>> >> Is
> there a less resource-intensive way for Xwiki to store attachments or a
> container more suitable for the way I use XWiki?>> > > Indeed, the most
> important thing is to change the underlying database > system, as HSQL is not
> meant to store large databases.> > As for the efficiency of storing
> attachments, this is a known problem > which should be fixed soon.> > -- >
> Sergiu Dumitriu> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/>
> _______________________________________________> users mailing list>
> [email protected]> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/usersWe've changed
> the underlying database to MySQL and installed it under ubuntu and all works
> much better now. The same database now occupies 2,6GB. The computer has 2GB
> RAM and a slow processor.We've upgraded to version 1.7 but this hole process
> wasn't easy because we haven't been able to use any import/export features so
> all the pages we're "copy/paste" transfered and all the attachments were
> re-uploaded.We've discovered that when uploading a file it takes up to 27x
> it's size on the server RAM, so you must set java_opts to 270MB to be able to
> load 10MB file. Is this a normal behavior?Adriano
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_022009
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
