Vincent Massol wrote: > On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote: >> >>> I try (if possible) to use only the new syntax in this wiki. And in >>> its quite >>> stable for most parts. The new WYSIWYG is better, but it laks >>> functionality >>> the old one had. >> Which features are you looking for that are lacking? >> >>> But back to my Blog problem: >>> >>> http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/ >>> >>> flickrusertag Macro didn't work after update. >>> >>> When i use the velocity code the result is an error >>> >>> The image link and the {{velocity}} things show that no new syntax is >>> used:wistle: >>> >>> Using the Macro on a normal Page works >>> >>> http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ >>> >>> So it seems no code can be used in the new Blog application >> Yes there seems to be some issues mixing the blog app written in 1.0 >> syntax with blog pages written in 2.0 syntax. I'll look into it to >> understand the problem. > > One problem is in our xwiki syntax 1.0 to 2.0 converter. What happens > is that when you convert a blog page into 2.0 syntax it calls > Blog.BlogPostSheet which is in xwiki 1.0 syntax so the new include > macro will automatically try to convert it to 2.0 syntax and there > seems to be some problem. Raised as comments in > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3107
Why does the include try to do this? > The second problem is on the blog WebHome page (which is syntax 1.0). > Since some blog pages are in syntax 2.0 their content are rendered in > syntax 2.0 but the syntax 1.0 page cannot display 2.0 content.... I'm > not sure yet how to solve this one... Theoretically the blog displays the content in the document's syntax, as it calls $entryDoc.getRenderedContent($entryContent, $entryDoc.syntaxId). Is there a bug here too? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
