On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something I just met - as it's an "improvement" proposal I thought I could
> propose it here, but I may just create a jira if you think it's interesting:
> Would be great if there could be an option, in Attachments tab at pages
> bottom, to display attachments as a grid of thumbnails, instead of just a
> list.
> The best would be to by default reach current Attachments view, when
> clicking on Attachments tab (because it shows fastly), then have a little
> flag, button, or whatever, to choose a "thumbnail" view.
> This "thumbnail" view, could be the exact same kind of view as proposed by
> Attachments Selector Macro [1].
> BTW it could be nice that this {{attachmentSelector/}} could be used as (or
> could rely on another extension that) merely displays attachments, without
> concept of saving the attachment name in a property in an XObject ...
>

> Use-case sample: when you import a .doc document, all images are set as
> attachments with automatic naming. Without thumbnail, it's quite hard then
> to retrieve a specific attachment without opening all of them one by one.

There is 
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/AttachmentGalleryMacro
.

>
> BR,
> Jeremie
>
> [1] -
> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Attachment+Selector+Macro
>
>
> 2014-12-10 9:46 GMT+01:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>>
>> On 10 Dec 2014 at 05:11:40, Jason Clemons ([email protected](mailto:
>> [email protected])) wrote:
>>
>> > I have say, upgrading makes me very nervous too..
>>
>> Have you ever tried using the Distribution Wizard?
>>
>> > so, I'd definitely vote for anything that changes or enhances that
>> process. So far, I'm terrified to even try an upgrade (currently on 5.4)
>> since my wiki is production and we've done a fair bit of customized
>> solutions to unique problems (likely not in a "supported" way maybe) .
>>
>> Well, first nobody should ever upgrade a wiki in production directly! You
>> should make backups and do the upgrade on a staging server and then only
>> move the instance to production.
>>
>> > My fear is that some piece of code or settings will get overwritten
>> which will break stuff and I won't know where to look to fix them. 😃
>> >
>> > A wizard would be awesome to take the guess work out of it.
>>
>> err… The Distribution Wizard …. is a... wizard ;)
>>
>> You should give it a try! We do have some ideas in jira to make it even
>> better but it’s already quite good in its current state.
>>
>> > As is, I've read some of the tutorials out there regarding upgrades
>> several times but I'm not really able to determine the prescribed steps
>> using those.
>>
>> What tutorial? Could you give me the links?
>>
>> > I think at the end of the day I'm going to end up exporting my solutions
>> as XAR's and then try importing them into an upgraded Xwiki environment
>> too, since it seems easier to me.
>>
>> The DW is generally a better solution to upgrades.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>> > > On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Le 9 déc. 2014 22:37, "Thomas Mortagne" a écrit
>> > > :
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Guillaume Lerouge
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>> Hi,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
>> > > [email protected]>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Harald Ommang > >>
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>> Hi!
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> In one way, I very much appreciate the relatively high frequency of
>> > >>>> updates done by the XWIKI crew. You are doing a great job, making
>> sure
>> > > that
>> > >>>> XWIKI is alive and kicking and always improving.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> The downside to this, is all the work needed to be done when
>> > > upgrading.
>> > >>>> So, I don't do that very often. The basic part of
>> > > installation/migration
>> > >>>> works very well, but when it comes to content, the upgrade
>> procedure is
>> > >>>> messy, as I see it. It is a hassle to have to pick and choose
>> between
>> > >>>> various parts when importing and exported XAR.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I would very much suggest planning for a future where the parts
>> that
>> > > are
>> > >>>> XWIKI software are clearly separated from the parts where customers
>> > >>>> typically do modifications. Especially items like users and groups.
>> It
>> > >>>> should be possible to have a more separated export/import so that
>> you
>> > > GET
>> > >>>> new versions of e.g. the admin pages, while still KEEPING your
>> setup of
>> > >>>> users, groups, etc., without having to click on a million of
>> > > checkboxes in
>> > >>>> the import.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I don't really understand this comment, doing export/import is
>> really
>> > >>>> not the standard way of doing an upgrade. In typical upgrade you
>> > >>>> backup everything if you want to be safe (or better you have
>> automated
>> > >>>> backups and you don't really need to do it when you upgrade),
>> upgrade
>> > >>>> the WAR part (if you use the Debian package then it's just about
>> doing
>> > >>>> apt-get upgrade or install with a specific version), restart, XWiki
>> > >>>> upgrade the database shema automatically if needed and then you get
>> > >>>> the Distribution Wizard which download and upgrade the wiki pages
>> with
>> > >>>> 3 ways merge. Most of the time you don't have anything to do.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Sure, but to benefit from all those nice Distribution Wizard
>> features,
>> > >>> Harald would first need to... upgrade to the latest version ;-)
>> > >>
>> > >> Distribution Wizard has been introduced in 4.2 so not really the
>> > >> latest version. And even before that export/import everything never
>> > >> really been standard upgrade process either.
>> > >
>> > > Sure, but you usually did reverse way : import new xwiki ui xar (and
>> > > remember to uncheck standard pages customized, or have them
>> overwritten).
>> > > And yes, it was sometimes a hassle, and compared to that distribution
>> > > wizard is really really great :)
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Guillaume
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to