<Yawn>

Bill Potts, CMS
San Jose, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of kilopascal
> Sent: November 17, 2000 19:49
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:9230] RE: (off topic) Re: the election
>
>
> 200-11-17
>
> Even if Buchanan is an isolationist, he would be a hypocrite if he was
> anti-metric and pro-FFU.  FFU is an imported unit hodge-podge.
> No American
> invented it. If you are against metric because of its foreign
> origins, then
> you have to be against FFU as well.  But then if he was president, he
> wouldn't care about such a technicality.
>
> John
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Daniel Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  Sent: Friday, 2000-11-17 11:57
>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Subject: Re: [USMA:9219] RE: (off topic) Re: the election
>
>
>  This is from the foxnews.com forum.
>
>  Bill Carp: I am a registered Repulican in Palm Beach County. When the
>  registration cards were sent out, I did not receive a sample
> ballot. Yet, I
>  know many registered Democrats got one of these booklets. Hmm.
> And, to top
>  it off, I managed to understand the butterfly ballot, cast my
> vote and was
>  not confused. Something friggin' stinks in this damn county!
>
>  Dan Bishop: But how do you know that you really voted for Bush? Maybe you
>  actually voted for Buchanan and just THOUGHT you had voted for
>  Bush.  Why is
>  confusion reserved for democrats? <g>
>
>  Bill Carp: Heh heh, that ballot was not hard. Hell, fourth
> graders all over
>  America have picked their candidate 100% of the time. Palm Beach
>  County Dems
>  must have stopped at grade three. ;)
>
>  I haven't been able to find Buchanan's opinion on metrication.  However,
>  since he does favor isolationism, I would assume he'd be anti-metric.
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 17:08
>  Subject: [USMA:9219] RE: (off topic) Re: the election
>
>
>  > 2000-11-16
>  >
>  > HA!  HA!  HA!  HA!  That is funny!  But, a very good question.
>  Why don't
>  > you submit it to the "letters to the editor" section of some on-line
>  > newspapers and see if you get a response?  That is worth investigating.
>  > Maybe, just maybe the Gore people are paying off some Buchanan
> supporters
>  to
>  > say they really voted for Gore but punched the wrong hole.
> Why not?  If
>  the
>  > Gore people can get bums in Milwaukee to vote, they can do anything.
>  >
>  > BTW, what does Buchanan think of metric?
>  >
>  > John
>  >
>  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>  >  Behalf Of Daniel Bishop
>  >  Sent: Thursday, 2000-11-16 00:56
>  >  To: U.S. Metric Association
>  >  Subject: [USMA:9214] (off topic) Re: the election
>  >
>  >
>  >  Just wondering:
>  >
>  >  Why haven't any Buchanan supporters complained that they might have
>  >  accidentally voted for Gore? <g>
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  _________________________________________________________
>  Do You Yahoo!?
>  Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>

Reply via email to