2002-04-24

I have Office 97 on my system and word 97 opened it fine.  No messages, no
errors.

John


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 2002-04-24 14:49
Subject: [USMA:19613] RE: Answer from MT editors


> Adrian:
>
> As not everyone has Word 2000 (or a word processor that can read Word 2000
> documents -- Word 97 cannot, for example), I've resaved your document in
> Rich Text Format (RTF). Most word processors (and all recent ones) can
read
> RTF files. I recommend you save any intended attachments in that format in
> the future.
>
> Good letter, by the way. I agree with you that, given that A0 paper has an
> area of exactly 1 m^2, A series can justifiably be called hard metric,
even
> though the  standards (A, B and C series) are not, themselves, SI.
>
> Bill Potts, CMS
> Roseville, CA
> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > Behalf Of Adrian Jadic
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:10
> > To: U.S. Metric Association
> > Subject: [USMA:19610] Answer from MT editors
> >
> >
> > In the latest MT there was a note from the editor regarding our
> > discussions
> > about using A3 paper for MT instaead of 11"x17".
> > It bothered me that we still don't get it that the A series as
> > well as B and
> > C series are *metric* sizes and people who are supposed to be
> > specialists in
> > metric  matters still believe that since the sizes of the A4 are not
round
> > cm or dm values than the A4 is not metric.
> >
> > I wrote a small explanation letter asking them to publish it in
> > response to
> > the eroneous Editor's note but instead I got the cold shoulder similar
to
> > what we get from all enemies of the metric system. In the meantime all
> > readers have been "assured" that the A series are not metric
> > therefore such
> > move is not justified.
> >
> > I am attaching my letter in MS Word 2000 format (no bugs). I need to use
a
> > word processing format since I used special text formatting.
> >
> > Adrian Jadic
> >
> > Following is the MT reply: I will comment on it in my next message to
the
> > listserv.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Valerie Antoine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 04 April, 2002 12:28
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Lorelle Young; Hillger, Don
> > Subject: Letter to the Editor
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your "Letter to the Editor" input, Adrian.  You make some
good
> > points.  However, USMA's mission is to make [correctly used]  SI the
only
> > measurement language used by the United States, not to promote
> > international
> > standards.   Of course, most international standards DO use SI.
> > But we are
> > not chartered to promote international standards.
> >
> > I get so MANY letters on various subjects from members and
> > non-members that
> > most of the 8 pages of Metric Today would be filled with only
> > those letters,
> > if I printed them.  I cannot print letters from some members, and ignore
> > letters from other members.
> >
> > There are times when I can't find room for ALL of the news articles
> > available for an issue of Metric Today, much less find room for letters.
> > Therefore, a policy has been established to NOT print letters to
> > the editor
> > in Metric Today, but to supply the Listserver for the exchange of
comments
> > between members.
> >
>

Reply via email to