On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:47:58 -0700 Brian J White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry to say....but I kinda agree with him. I think km per liter > would > have been a much better choice than liters per 100km. L/100 km is fuel consumption km/L is mileage (in km, I still call it mileage!) Mike Payne ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
- [USMA:20746] Re: L/100 km Michael D Payne
- [USMA:20746] Re: L/100 km Wizard of OS
- [USMA:20747] Re: L/100 km Bill Potts
- [USMA:20748] Re: Reciprocal quantities (was: L/100 km... Markus Kuhn
- [USMA:20754] Re: Reciprocal quantities (was: L/10... kilopascal
- [USMA:20760] Optimism vs. Pessimism [was RE... Nat Hager III
- [USMA:20762] Re: Optimism vs. Pessimism ... kilopascal
- [USMA:20777] Re: Optimism vs. Pessim... Nat Hager III
- [USMA:20778] Re: Optimism vs. Pe... Wizard of OS
- [USMA:20780] Re: Optimism vs. Pe... kilopascal
- [USMA:20783] Re: Optimism vs... Nat Hager III
