on 9/4/2002 10:50 PM, Mike Joy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (After bemoaning the lack of metric progress in America's >"National Geographic" magazine, Mike wrote ...) > ... so I now subscribe to the Australian Geographic Magazine > which I find to be a far superior production (it's 100% metric)
I looked into the Canadian Geographic to see if it would make a good substitute for the anti-metic National Geographic. The Canadian magazine was very good and also all metric (like Mike's Auatralian version), as far as I could tell, but it consisted solely of Canadian articles. I was looking for the global scope of the "National Geographic". It looks like there is no substitue that is both all-metric and whole-world oriented. I plan on dropping National Geographic and just doing without. Regards, Bill Hooper college physics teacher (retired), USA (Florida) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Do It Easy, Do It Metric! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
