|
2002-10-26
I don't believe this reasoning. That is more
likely the excuse given to justify continuing with old units. There could
be more practical reasons, such as the media continues to use it and people want
to compare themselves with sex symbols. If the sex symbols switched to SI
only and made it appear that real sexy people use SI and only duds and losers
used fFU , you'd see a switch over-night.
Other reasons is that clothing sizes are still in
FFU and tape measures are still available in FFU. Get rid of the inch
sizing and tape measures and you will also see a switch to SI. Oh sure,
people will back convert for awhile, but eventually it will become a tiring
nuisance and the practice will end.
As long as it is easy to use FFU, the practice will
continue. Make it difficult, and the practice will end.
John
|
- [USMA:22943] RE: Canadian ifp spam CarletonM
- [USMA:23064] RE: Canadian ifp spam kilopascal
- [USMA:23064] RE: Canadian ifp spam Joseph B. Reid
- [USMA:23065] RE: Canadian ifp spam kilopascal
- [USMA:23066] RE: Canadian ifp spam kilopascal
- [USMA:23270] Brassiere sizes Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:23274] RE: Brassiere sizes Nat Hager III
- [USMA:23278] RE: Brassiere sizes James Wentworth
- [USMA:23291] RE: Brassiere sizes metric
- [USMA:23355] RE: Brassiere sizes Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:23063] RE: Canadian ifp spam Joseph B. Reid
