>Terry implies that scientific research done prior to 1948, and some >done after that, is not uselful.
Old research is useful. I did not intend to imply that it is not. >Where else than in the SI brochure could a student find >authoritative definitions of erg, dyne, poise, stokes, gauss, >oersted, maxwell, stilb, phot, gall, micron and metric >carat? That question presupposes that I think that units not current should be in the SI brochure. I don't think they should be in the SI brochure.
