|
Whining
contractors who have the ear of their legislatures. cm -----Original
Message----- I read
the posting about the N. Y. s. D.O. T. thinking of going back to FFU. If
this happens i feel it would be an unfortunate thing. I feel that any
state that has gone back to FFU will probably never go back to metric.
Why have so many states gone back? I believe all highway construction
contracts in Canada are metric, but i'm not sure. If someone could let me
know i would really appreciate it. It must of cost Utah quite a bit of
money to switch back to FFU considering they had sold all their old FFU
books. The BWMA would love to hear about N.Y. thinking of going back to
FFU. I also believe that all highway construction contracts in the U K are done
in metric, again if someone could let me know that would be great. Just
think if highway construction contracts in the U K are in metric the members of
the BWMA have to either walk or drive on them every
day. Oh how that must bug them. Have a great evening
John. |
- [USMA:28195] New York state department of transportatio... john mercer
- [USMA:28200] Re: New York state department of tran... Andy Johnson
- [USMA:28201] Re: New York state department of ... Brian J White
- [USMA:28203] Re: New York state department of tran... Joseph B. Reid
- [USMA:28205] Re: New York state department of ... Terry Simpson
- [USMA:28218] Re: New York state department of tran... Carleton MacDonald
- [USMA:28218] Re: New York state department of tran... Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:28238] Metric Roads in Australia Gene Mechtly
- [USMA:28240] Re: Metric Roads in Australia Pat Naughtin
