This is exactly the reason why I do not believe in 'democracy' in such
cases. It leads to muddle and endless confusion for decades. I hope that it
will work in the USA, where many people are suspicious of what the
government does. It evidently does not work in Canada and Britain, and it
did not work in many nations that went metric in the past.
Many nations tried the voluntary approach, but as soon as metrication
reached the retail trades, trouble started and this is what happened in
Britain and Canada. In France it almost destroyed the metric system. Only
strict laws that forced trade (not private citizens!) to use metric ended
the muddle.
In Canada some conservative politicians thought of the ballot box and
climbed the anti-metric bandwagon, with this madness as a result.
I am glad that we have not adopted the euro the 'democratic' way. We would
have double pricing and double currencies for decades. On all other issues
we are democracies.
Years ago I read a Letter to the Editor in the Guardian, where a British
person reported that the street markets in Kenya went metric almost
overnight with no difficulties whatsoever, no consumer and traders
resistance. This also seems to have been the case in other Third World
countries. Why can these poor nations achieve what some rich nations cannot?

Han


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ezra Steinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2004-03-26 23:14
Subject: [USMA:29310] Canadian metric muddle evident


> Someone posted recently an article from a newspaper in the prairie
provinces arguing against the current Canadian metric muddle and
recommending going back to Imperial or completely forward to metric. (Hard
for me to see how they can go back given all the current investment in
metric, like speed limit and distance signs, and the fact that the last
hold-out, the USA, is inching -- yes, that's deliberate on my part --- 
towards conversion.)
>
> I saw this quite clearly on the Science Channel last night on a program
that talked about monster trucks. (No, not what you see at the speedway on
Saturday night, but the huge multi-million dollar trucks that are used in
mining, etc.) They shot the program in Canada, and the engineers and other
folks interviewed kept bouncing around from metric to Imperial. The pattern
I thought I discerned was that they used metric for short distances (metres)
, liquid quantities (litres), and temperature (degrees Celsius) and Imperial
for longer distances (miles).
>
> Come to think of it, that sounds a lot like what most Brits seem to be
doing these days, n'est-ce pas? Don't they have a muddle there, too?? ;-)
>
> Still, there miles ahead of US! (Still deliberate ... )
>
>
>

Reply via email to