Dear Pierre,

You might like to have a look at an article, 'Metric cooking with
confidence', I wrote on this subject at:
http://www.metricationmatters.com/articles.html

It is at the bottom of the page and it is in pdf format.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia
61 3 5241 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.metricationmatters.com


on 2005-02-06 11.39, Pierre Abbat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I've read that metric recipes usually quote the mass, not volume, of solid
> ingredients. A recipe I found on a cereal box illustrates why. It calls for 2
> cups of flakes, lightly crushed. I don't know whether that means to measure 2
> cups and then crush them, or crush them and measure 2 cups, which could
> easily be twice as much. The box is labeled 340 grams, not by volume.
> 
> For rice, though, I'm used to measuring volumes. So I poured some rice into a
> measuring cup, noted that it's 150 ml, and measured 300 ml of water, and just
> turned the heat down.
> 
> Once for fun, when making pancakes, I measured it au pifom�tre as I always do,
> then put it on the scale after each ingredient. It came out to:
> 111 g mix (Arrowhead Mills buttermilk, maybe with another kind mixed in)
> 142 g water
> 6 g oil (olive, maybe hemp)
> 47 g egg.
> 
> So how do you cook? Mass or volume?
> 
> phma

Reply via email to