The pound in the UK is a legally defined unit - equal to 454g

Actually it's 453.59237 g

I show this so you can see how awkward the conversion is.

I just think that both "systems" should be used and let the consumer decide. Use education if you want - and let the preference for whatever system flow through.

Yes!  Yes!  Add as much clutter to the price displays as possible.

Erm, calm down - I'm talking about "xx/kg   xx/lb"

And add cost tothe product to pay for the time and materials to dual price.

Are you honestly saying that a felt tip pen's ink is a real profit/loss scenario at a supermarket deli?
I mean..
..really?

I think you underestimate the effort required to maintain dual prices. There is always the risk of mistakes in the conversion and I've seen plenty of examples where dual pricing is shown on some things but neglected in others - in the same store! I'm willing to bet that if you ask people who work in shops that many will tell you it's a damn nuisance.

Just to preserve something not needed. Very efficient way to do business.

You believe its not needed.
There are those with different opinions to yourself. No seriously! There are!

The need can only be justified on a transitional basis. No one (not even politicians) deliberately engineered a situation where this halfway house would continue indefinitely. I've yet to see a logical argument for the retention of dual measures except to satisfy those who refuse to accept change.

To me it's not a case of enforcing the display of something - its fighting the the illegalization of the display of something.

You're forgetting the road signs issue. ARM are *enforcing* the law *against* the display of metric. If you don't agree with this then maybe you should reconsider your support for both them and BWMA.

Phil Hall

Reply via email to