> > I still have to ask if you see ANYTHING positive in > his response? I > certainly do, even if it is only a small step.
Nobody said that there was nothing positive in his response, merely that people shouldn't necessarily interpret his response to mean that he was considering rational metric sizes (a good thing), with simply including an irrational metric equivalent of the current imperial size. Bill Hooper, has since replied that the current bottles do include 355 mL on the labels (something that you can't tell from their website), so that would indicate that the company president may actually have meant that he was considering a rational metric size. That would be very good.
