From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Subject: [USMA:36850] RE: Wyeth footage Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:31:53 -0700 In the context of his message, you'd say "great scenes," rather than great "footage." In addition to avoiding a word derived from a non-SI unit, it's independentof the medium on which the movie is recorded. For example, when it comes outon DVD, should we still be referring to footage? Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of Robert H. Bushnell >Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 09:22 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:36849] Wyeth footage > > > 2006 May 26 >In 36836 Harry Wyeth reports location "within two feet". >Then he says there is "great footage". >So, all of you: what do we say instead of "footage"? >Please help. > Robert Bushnell PhD PE >
I think the term footage is in reference to the original media - something
which movie-film distributors still refer too.
- [USMA:36849] Wyeth footage Robert H. Bushnell
- [USMA:36850] RE: Wyeth footage Bill Potts
- [USMA:36868] RE: Wyeth footage Bill Hooper
- [USMA:36869] RE: Wyeth footage Bill Potts
- [USMA:36875] RE: Wyeth footage Martin Vlietstra
- [USMA:36876] RE: Wyeth footage Martin Vlietstra
- [USMA:36872] RE: Wyeth footage Stephen Humphreys
- [USMA:36853] Re: Wyeth footage Pierre Abbat
- [USMA:36867] Re: Wyeth footage Bill Hooper
- [USMA:36870] Re: Wyeth footage Phil Chernack
- [USMA:36873] RE: Imperial metaphors (was ... Philip S Hall
