Well, there is something related - CDMA is another case of the USA doing things differently than 80% of the rest of the world ...
Wonder which is actually better. Carleton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Payne Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 23:07 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:38224] RE: Brand New Phone, 12 Hour Time. Not that this has much to do with metric, but I switched from Cingular to T-Mobile just over a year ago and I've found the coverage with T-Mobile better using a GSM phone, I also use my phone worldwide. Michael Payne ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nat Hager III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 16 March 2007 02:59 Subject: [USMA:38222] RE: Brand New Phone, 12 Hour Time. >>> You actually cared about TDMA coverage and left Cingular because of >>> that? > > Wow, you deserve the 12 hour time then. hahahaha.. Of course, maybe > I'm > spoiled because I'm in Seattle. Home of both AT&T Wireless (before > Cingular > bought them) and T-Mobile. >>> > > You bet. In 2005 Cingular GSM coverage was only slightly better than > T-Mobile, in 2004 it was experimental on the weaker 1900 MHz band only, my > phone switched to TDMA half the time. > > Nat > > >
