Not all scientists are liberal, and science is more than just global warming and evolution. Let's jut hope these issues don't scare away any candidates.
I think that since science/technology achievements have accounted for 50% of the GDP in the last 50 years, science policy should account for something. Currently, Asian countries are out-performing us in educating new scientists. If current trends continue, 90% of all the world's scientists and engineers will be in Asian countries by 2010. That is on the next president's watch. If we want to improve math/science education in this country and compete globally, we need to improve science education. Completing metrication in this country would be a good start toward that goal. -- Scott Hudnall Seattle, WA USA On Wednesday, February 13, 2008, at 08:22AM, "Rocky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You shouldn't find any Republicans candidates at the Science Debate. Why would >a conservative come to be scolded by a room full of eminent liberal scientists >if he does not agree that: (1) global warming is caused by industrial nations, >(2) every schoolchild needs to know that man evolved from primordial soup, and >(3) there is an urgent need for increased Federal funding. > >rocky > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ >Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. >http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > >
