Absolutely! The NIST documents are great.

I would also recommend not showing U.S. readers any documents that use the
spelling "-metre" - not if we want to persuade them.


> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed,  9 Jul 2008 22:55:10 -0500 (CDT)
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [USMA:41375] SI for Editors
> 
> Bill,
> 
> In e-mail promoting SI to editors in the USA, the *availability* of NIST SP
> 330 and of SP 811 from the Internet is worthy of recommendation.
> 
> These two sources are missing from your discussion of symbols vs.
> abbreviations.  Editors in the USA might be more responsive to these two NIST
> documents than to the BIPM booklet, especially if they encounter the French
> version.
> 
> Gene. 
> 

Reply via email to