Victor,

That could be a plus, but is there any proof he would remember it later in 
life, especially if he hadn't used it since he returned to the US?

If sure would solve a lot of curiosity if someone would just ask him his 
position and if he would make an effort to change this nation.

Jerry




________________________________
From: Victor Jockin <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:34:01 PM
Subject: [USMA:42557] Re: President Obama at George Mason University


Remember that Obama went to elementary school in Indonesia until he was 10.  
I'm sure metric is the first measurement system he learned.
 


From: Martin Vlietstra 
Sent: 01/25/2009 8:20 AM
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:42504] Re: President Obama at George Mason University

According to Obama’s biography (at least what I have read of it), any trips to 
Kenya were of short in duration.  During that period he might well have seen 
metric units in on road signs, but probably no more than the average young 
American who spends a summer in Europe . 
 

________________________________

From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Jeremiah MacGregor
Sent: 24 January 2009 18:10
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:42450] Re: President Obama at George Mason University
 
Stan,
 
Has Obama ever been to Kenya ?  If not, then what experience would he have with 
metrics there?
 
Even if the weather service service works in metrics internally what would stop 
them and others from converting when reporting to the public?
 
Jerry
 

________________________________

From:STANLEY DOORE < [email protected] >
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:55:40 PM
Subject: [USMA:42407] Re: President Obama at George Mason University
Paul et al,
    Obama has the opportunity with his background and experience with Kenya and 
other nations to change to the SI now.  It would fit with his program of 
change, and it would be meaningful.
    During the 1970s, the NOAA National Weather Service planned to make 
conversion to the SI and to begin purchasing observation sensors and readouts 
in metric.  So the NWS is ready to convert to metric in the public arena when 
The Congress and the President desire. 
 
    Weather  forecasts have been computed in metric since the late 1950s 
so changes in output need to be made for presentation to the public.  Aviation 
uses metric in international aviation now.  Going metric in weather, including 
satellite images, would simplify and streamline the whole operation.  The 
weather information system is ready to go metric.
 
Stan Doore
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From:Paul Trusten 
To:U.S. Metric Association 
Sent:Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:49 AM
Subject:[USMA:42404] Re: President Obama at George Mason University
 
Stan, I disagree.  Yes, for several years now, we at USMA and others on this 
list have indeed supported the FPLA metric-only labeling option, seeing it as 
an important spark to educate the U.S. public in the terrible vacuum of silence 
on metrication. But, what is really needed is general assent to a clear, 
coordinated national plan to change over to metric. Picture President 
Obama sharing a podium with leaders of  U.S.industries, academia, the media, 
and the entertainment world, in a joint announcement to fulfill the 
recommendations of the 1971 Commerce Department report on metric, with a plan 
to change the Nation predominantly to metric, sector by sector, in  10 years.  
Until such a plan is formulated, our country will not change over to metric 
effectively.  Considering our new president's currently huge popularity, he 
sure could make a difference.  But, I'm not at all sure that he would move on 
metric this year, or even next year.  We do
 know that metric is fourth on that obamacto..org list; this could help.
 
Paul
----- Original Message ----- 
From:STANLEY DOORE 
To:U.S. Metric Association 
Sent:22 January, 2009 08:08
Subject:[USMA:42402] Re: President Obama at George Mason University
 
Pat et al:
 
    Changing laws in the US to allow metric only labeling and requiring the 
Federal Government to buy metric products and to make conversion to the SI 
mandatory, such as weather reporting and road signs, needs to be the first 
step.  Until this is done, it won't happen.
 
Stan Doore
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From:Pat Naughtin 
To:U..S. Metric Association 
Sent:Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:39 AM
Subject:[USMA:42401] President Obama at George Mason University
 
Dear All, 
 
I have just been reading the text of the speech that President Barack Obama 
presented at George Mason University on January 8. His forward thinking plans 
particularly struck me as plans that would all benefit enormously from being 
conducted using metric system measurements. Here is part of the text of 
President Obama's speech:
That work begins with this plan – a plan I am confident will save or create at 
least three million jobs over the next few years. It is not just another public 
works program. It’s a plan that recognizes both the paradox and the promise of 
this moment – the fact that there are millions of Americans trying to find 
work, even as, all around the country, there is so much work to be done. That’s 
why we’ll invest in priorities like energy and education; health care and a new 
infrastructure that are necessary to keep us strong and competitive in the 21st 
century. That’s why the overwhelming majority of the jobs created will be in 
the private sector, while our plan will save the public sector jobs of 
teachers, cops, fire fighters and others who provide vital services.
To finally spark the creation of a clean energy economy, we will double the 
production of alternative energy in the next three years. We will modernize 
more than 75% of federal buildings and improve the energy efficiency of two 
million American homes, saving consumers and taxpayers billions on our energy 
bills. In the process, we will put Americans to work in new jobs that pay well 
and can’t be outsourced – jobs building solar panels and wind turbines; 
constructing fuel-efficient cars and buildings; and developing the new energy 
technologies that will lead to even more jobs, more savings, and a cleaner, 
safer planet in the bargain.
To improve the quality of our health care while lowering its cost, we will make 
the immediate investments necessary to ensure that within five years, all of 
America ’s medical records are computerized. This will cut waste, eliminate red 
tape, and reduce the need to repeat expensive medical tests.. But it just won’t 
save billions of dollars and thousands of jobs – it will save lives by reducing 
the deadly but preventable medical errors that pervade our health care system.
To give our children the chance to live out their dreams in a world that’s 
never been more competitive, we will equip tens of thousands of schools, 
community colleges, and public universities with 21st century classrooms, labs, 
and libraries. We’ll provide new computers, new technology, and new training 
for teachers so that students in Chicago and Boston can compete with kids in 
Beijing for the high-tech, high-wage jobs of the future.
I couldn't help thinking that the metrication elephant had got into the room 
again without anyone noticing. See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/AMetricationElephant.pdf to see how 
metrication in the USA would help to implement President Obama's plans.
Cheers,
Pat Naughtin
 
PO Box 305Belmont3216,
Geelong, Australia
Phone: 61 3 5241 2008
 
Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA . Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada , the UK , and the USA . 
See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact 
Pat at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication 
matters' newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to 
subscribe.


      

Reply via email to