Even though the calorie is an old metric unit many people think it is part of 
the English collection.  

Jerry




________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: U..S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2009 1:47:01 PM
Subject: [USMA:44487] Re: FPLA 2010


More precisely, Stan, the "calorie" is a measurement of the specific heat of 
water (joules) at a particular temperature, and is now listed as "unacceptable" 
as a unit, on Page 11 of NIST SP 811 (2008).

I agree with your comment on "sodium" which should be "salt" or "NaCl".  What 
can be said about "sea salt" which consists of a wide variety of other metallic 
salts, not just NaCl?

Is sea salt bad for the circulatory system?

Gene.

---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:18:29 -0400
>From: "Stan Jakuba" <[email protected]>  
>Subject: [USMA:44480] Re: FPLA 2010  
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>
>While on the food labeling issue, in my collection of labels from many 
>countries, only the U..S. is denying the existence of energy in food. One 
>wonders how the fattest people in the world become so obese if the amount of 
>the label-specified fat would not sustain a pet. I am referring, of course,
>to the mysterious "calories" in the column of protein, fat, calcium,....... 
>See the attachment (included for the non-Americans).
>
>Other nations print the word "energy" (in the respective language), and list 
>value in kJ (sometimes concurrently with kcal).
>
>This U.S. labeling specialty makes it possible to see the same 
>chocolate/candy-bar portrayed on two different TV channels in the U.S. as 
>follows:
>
>One commercial shows the bar on the background of jumping, celebrating, 
>happy teenagers, the message conveying: Buy it, eat it, be happy; it has 
>lots of energy. Energy is good for you. Can't eat too much of it.
>
>A nutrition promoting channel next to it shows the same candy bar with the 
>message of rotten teeth and obese children slumbering about while being 
>told: The product is bad for you. It has calories. Calories are bad. Stay 
>away from them. Don't buy it, don't eat it.
>
>I'd like to understand the mind-set of the FPLA official who did not
>recognize that calorie is a unit, not a quantity. The same person perhaps,
>who is responsible for the missing spaces in the metric values while they
>exist in the I-P values.
>
>There is another mystery on the U.S. labels and I hope there is a 
>chemist/nutritionist on this forum who can explain why the nutritional 
>labels list sodium, a highly toxic element nobody can eat. I'd say "salt" or 
>"NaCl" or some other name if there are several different salts involved, but 
>"sodium"?
>Stan Jakuba


      

Reply via email to