NASA has done it before. After initially going metric in the 70s (I was running 
various training classes in all the NASA centers subsequently) they reverted 
instantaneously to I-P after one of the space disasters with loss of life. 
("Our engineers can work safer in I-P.") Four years later cool heads prevailed 
and NASA was thinking about going back. It called a conference of their 
suppliers and had them present how much it would cost to go back to metric. It 
was interesting for me, knowing some of the companies, that those that had 
experience with metric showed a reasonable amount, even zero, while others were 
doubling their costs obviously trying to make money or simply not knowing and 
guessing on the safe side. Foreign companies were involved also. No conclusion 
was drawn from this conference and no directive issued for years, if ever (I do 
not know). The interesting thing for me was to notice that NASA did not ask 4 
years earlier how much would it cost to go from metric to I-P. Apparently the 
companies ate that cost being too small to bather. Anyway, without a binding 
directive some suppliers went metric, some not, and, of course, the foreign 
suppliers worked metrically. This indecision resulted in numerous little 
disasters, well hidden, except those too big to hide, such as the Mars orbiter 
- $125 million was admitted as we all read. 
So much for the hope that the democrats will be pro-metric. 
Stan Jakuba
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Potts 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: 09 May 29, Friday 20:05
  Subject: [USMA:45127] Re: NASA Going English


  They're out of their cotton-picking minds -- and at a time when it would be a 
good strategy to cooperate with the Russians, the British and the French on the 
hardware.

  Bill 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Bill Potts
  WFP Consulting
  Roseville, CA
  http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of [email protected]
    Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 16:20
    To: U.S. Metric Association
    Cc: U.S. Metric Association
    Subject: [USMA:45125] Re: NASA Going English


    So, this is the "change we need"? Back to the 19th century????

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "John M. Steele" <[email protected]>
    To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
    Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 4:11:49 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
    Subject: [USMA:45124] NASA Going English

          Unbelievable.

          http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=31353

          Quoted from link:
          Subject: New Management Directive on Units

          All,

          You've all heard the news that we're going back to English as the 
primary unit of measure. Attached is the draft Management Directive. We're 
planning on bring this MD to the CxCB on 6/5/09. Please let me know if you have 
any issues.
         

Reply via email to