This makes a lot of good sense, Phil, as far as an explanation goes. 

However, it certainly does fly in the face of this (still on the NASA web 
site): 
http://sse.jpl.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=731 

Ezra 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Chernack" <[email protected]> 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 6:35:13 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:45164] Re: NASA Going English 


I think that NASA did not do a good job of explaining what is really going on 
here. The case is simple: they are reusing the Apollo technology to accelerate 
this program. Apollo, as you know was done in customary measurement. To start 
to reengineer all of that data and design work to SI would be cost-prohibitive 
and extend development time far beyond what is reasonable. If this was 
explained up front, we might all be a little more (albiet grudingly) accepting 
of it. 

In the long run, it is in NASA's best interest to go SI and I believe they 
will. I also believe in the long run, the country as a whole will get there. We 
may seem to be taking steps back from time to time but overall, we are 
progressing towards metric. Maybe one day soon, we will get the impetus we need 
to make a giant leap forward. 

Phil 


On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:37 AM, STANLEY DOORE < [email protected] > wrote: 




The continued opposition to the metric system of measurement (SI) by the United 
States is just another example of the continuing decline of the US. 
Stan Doore 




----- Original Message ----- 
From: Carleton MacDonald 

To: U.S. Metric Association 

Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:19 PM 
Subject: [USMA:45157] Re: NASA Going English 







Unfortunately I agree with you. The Arizona highway people, all the highway 
departments in the USA that reverted from metric to English measure, and the 
NASA people, no doubt believe that the USA will NEVER go metric. They are 
reverting because of whining from contractors who have political clout, and 
they firmly believe that this reversion, and the use of English measure, will 
go on forever. 



This administration, and this Democratic Congress, is politically the most 
likely to ever carry out the final metrication process. They have promoted 
change and have promoted America becoming more a partner in the world, and 
their supporters (which includes me) are those more likely to be in favor of 
metrication (I know pretty much every one of my friends and acquaintances 
thinks that way – they all wonder why it wasn’t done years ago). If they don’t 
do it, no future administration will. 



The way the US Congress works (easy to hinder things, hard to pass things), the 
whole “State’s Rights” situation here that doesn’t exist in many other places, 
the radio talk show babblers, and the whole army of whiners who just hate 
change, all make me rather pessimistic that anything will ever be done. 



Carleton 





From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of 
Victor Jockin 
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 19:30 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:45150] Re: NASA Going English 




I strongly agree that mandatory conversion in the only answer, but I also 
believe it will not happen in the US within the lifetimes of anyone reading 
this. The US metric conversion debacle of the last 40 years makes for an 
interesting case study in American government. In short, I think our government 
is nearly unique among western democracies in that it is incapable of acting in 
the public interest when private interests oppose action. The Senate is an 
undemocratic institution that empowers individual senators (i.e., the financial 
backers of individual senators) to block almost any action. Add to that public 
ignorance of the need to for metric conversion, and we can forget about a 
metric America. This is tragic, but so are the innumerable other legislative 
disasters we endure as a nation, our current $trillion+ budget deficits being 
one recent example. 













From: Carleton MacDonald 


Sent: 05/29/2009 7:15 PM 


To: U.S. Metric Association 


Subject: [USMA:45134] Re: NASA Going English 




I know this will inflame the libertarians here but the ONLY thing that is going 
to fix this, fix Arizona, fix the highway departments reverting, etc. is for 
nationwide legislation, passed by this Congress and signed by this President, 
to immediately begin a coordinated, concerted and mandatory effort to finish 
the metrication job in all aspects of American government, commerce, and 
society, and in a span of time no more than two years. Do not listen to the 
“freedom of choice” whiners, to those who want this to be “voluntary”, etc. 
That’s what has put us in the terrible situation we are now in, with reversions 
all over the place. I really do think they’d get a lot less resistance than 
they think they would, if only they would get the cojones to just get the job 
done and stop worrying about or listening to the complainers. 



Carleton 





From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of 
[email protected] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 19:20 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Cc: U.S. Metric Association 
Subject: [USMA:45125] Re: NASA Going English 




So, this is the "change we need"? Back to the 19th century???? 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John M. Steele" < [email protected] > 
To: "U.S. Metric Association" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 4:11:49 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [USMA:45124] NASA Going English 
        


Unbelievable. 





http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=31353 





Quoted from link: 


Subject: New Management Directive on Units 

All, 

You've all heard the news that we're going back to English as the primary unit 
of measure. Attached is the draft Management Directive. We're planning on bring 
this MD to the CxCB on 6/5/09. Please let me know if you have any issues. 


Reply via email to