I think that NASA did not do a good job of explaining what is really going on here. The case is simple: they are reusing the Apollo technology to accelerate this program. Apollo, as you know was done in customary measurement. To start to reengineer all of that data and design work to SI would be cost-prohibitive and extend development time far beyond what is reasonable. If this was explained up front, we might all be a little more (albiet grudingly) accepting of it.
In the long run, it is in NASA's best interest to go SI and I believe they will. I also believe in the long run, the country as a whole will get there. We may seem to be taking steps back from time to time but overall, we are progressing towards metric. Maybe one day soon, we will get the impetus we need to make a giant leap forward. Phil On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:37 AM, STANLEY DOORE <[email protected]>wrote: > The continued opposition to the metric system of measurement (SI) by > the United States is just another example of the continuing decline of the > US. > Stan Doore > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Carleton MacDonald <[email protected]> > *To:* U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:19 PM > *Subject:* [USMA:45157] Re: NASA Going English > > Unfortunately I agree with you. The Arizona highway people, all the > highway departments in the USA that reverted from metric to English measure, > and the NASA people, no doubt believe that the USA will NEVER go metric. > They are reverting because of whining from contractors who have political > clout, and they firmly believe that this reversion, and the use of English > measure, will go on forever. > > > > This administration, and this Democratic Congress, is politically the most > likely to ever carry out the final metrication process. They have promoted > change and have promoted America becoming more a partner in the world, and > their supporters (which includes me) are those more likely to be in favor of > metrication (I know pretty much every one of my friends and acquaintances > thinks that way – they all wonder why it wasn’t done years ago). If they > don’t do it, no future administration will. > > > > The way the US Congress works (easy to hinder things, hard to pass things), > the whole “State’s Rights” situation here that doesn’t exist in many other > places, the radio talk show babblers, and the whole army of whiners who just > hate change, all make me rather pessimistic that anything will ever be done. > > > > Carleton > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Victor Jockin > *Sent:* Saturday, May 30, 2009 19:30 > *To:* U.S. Metric Association > *Subject:* [USMA:45150] Re: NASA Going English > > > > I strongly agree that mandatory conversion in the only answer, but I also > believe it will not happen in the US within the lifetimes of anyone reading > this. The US metric conversion debacle of the last 40 years makes for an > interesting case study in American government. In short, I > think our government is nearly unique among western democracies in that it > is incapable of acting in the public interest when private interests oppose > action. The Senate is an undemocratic institution that empowers individual > senators (i.e., the financial backers of individual senators) to block > almost any action. Add to that public ignorance of the need to for metric > conversion, and we can forget about a metric America. This is tragic, but > so are the innumerable other legislative disasters we endure as a nation, > our current $trillion+ budget deficits being one recent example. > > > > > > > > *From:* Carleton MacDonald <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* 05/29/2009 7:15 PM > > *To:* U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]> > > *Subject:* [USMA:45134] Re: NASA Going English > > > > I know this will inflame the libertarians here but the ONLY thing that is > going to fix this, fix Arizona, fix the highway departments reverting, etc. > is for nationwide legislation, passed by this Congress and signed by this > President, to immediately begin a coordinated, concerted and > *mandatory*effort to finish the metrication job in all aspects of American > government, > commerce, and society, and in a span of time no more than two years. Do not > listen to the “freedom of choice” whiners, to those who want this to be > “voluntary”, etc. That’s what has put us in the terrible situation we are > now in, with reversions all over the place. I really do think they’d get a > lot less resistance than they think they would, if only they would get the > *cojones* to just get the job done and stop worrying about or listening to > the complainers. > > > > Carleton > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2009 19:20 > *To:* U.S. Metric Association > *Cc:* U.S. Metric Association > *Subject:* [USMA:45125] Re: NASA Going English > > > > So, this is the "change we need"? Back to the 19th century???? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John M. Steele" <[email protected]> > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 4:11:49 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific > Subject: [USMA:45124] NASA Going English > > Unbelievable. > > > > http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=31353 > > > > Quoted from link: > > Subject: New Management Directive on Units > > All, > > You've all heard the news that we're going back to English as the primary > unit of measure. Attached is the draft Management Directive. We're planning > on bring this MD to the CxCB on 6/5/09. Please let me know if you have any > issues. > > > >
