Oh ok - it DOES remind me! - just questioning myself if it's very similar to 
the sign subject or not :-) 

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [USMA:46988] Re: Where's the common sense in this??
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:22:40 +0000
























I once heard of a 16-year old who was “slightly
pregnant”.

 









From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen 
Humphreys

Sent: 27 March 2010 13:53

To: U.S. Metric Association

Subject: [USMA:46988] Re: Where's
the common sense in this??



 

Ok - I missed the smiley - sorry!  :-)



 





What would be REALLY intriguing is if they DID 'dual up'
this signs and retroconverted.  That is, I wonder if the supplementary
marking would say '84 cm' !!! :-)





 





This all 'slightly' reminds me of
when I sold my last house and the living room was quoted as "  24'
(30 m) long " !!







Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:45:16
-0700

From: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [USMA:46982] Re: Where's the common sense in this??

To: [email protected];
[email protected]





Of course I know it is a mistake, hence the smiley.





 





However, given the recommendation for dual signage, that recommendation
was certainly followed haphazardly, with every sign following a different
practice.  Add to that a mistake like the 33", well, it becomes
pretty laughable, but, to be honest, we are laughing at them, not with them.





 





A bird splat will fix the 33".  If they KNEW the
recommendation for dual signage was becoming a requirement (even if not in
force yet), I believe they made a poor choice.  Given the haphazard use of
single unit/dual unit, they obviously didn't put much thought into the whole
decision.





 









From: Stephen
Humphreys <[email protected]>

To: U.S. Metric Association
<[email protected]>

Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 9:29:01
PM

Subject: [USMA:46982] Re: Where's
the common sense in this??



Yes we have 'Tonka' over here - I remember having one! 



 





John - I would have thought you would recognise a mistake like this
(33")?  And the fact that most - if not all - people would recognise
what they really meant?  Of all the signs on our roads one measure mistake
is not bad going (and just a little ' to boot!).





 





A worse mistake is in Wales
- where someone from the signs department emailed a Welsh clerk who's job it
was to offer back the Welsh translation.  Unfortunately this Welsh clerk
was on holiday and had a 'out of office' message in Welsh - a translation of
which was something like 'In my absence please email .... etc'.  That
message ended up on the road sign!!   (I believe I am accurate in the
story - its on the BBC news website somewhere).





 





Anyway - back to the topic - it was a mistake - and I would immediately
understand that they meant 33 feet knowing instinctively that 33 inches would
be a very small vehicle.





 





I think they should have
thought harder before presenting the story the way they did.







Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010
18:08:55 -0700

From: [email protected]

Subject: [USMA:46981] Re: Where's the common sense in this??

To: [email protected]





Tonka is a brand of toy trucks in the US
(not sure about the UK). 
My son is an adult now, but when he was little, he had Tonka trucks bigger than
are allowed in the tunnel. :)





 





It certainly drives a stake in the argument that Imperial units are
natural, intuitive, and well understood.





 





To your point of doing a better job, we are currently headed down a
worse path.  The metric sign content that had existed on par with
Customary in the MUTCD has been removed or moved to an appendix in the 2009
edition.  Had we actually reached a point of it recommending (rather than
allowing) dual signing, I don't think it would have been left as a
recommendation for 20 years.  It would have become a requirement more
quickly, with older signs grandfathered until they had to be replaced. 
DfT seems to lack commitment to their recommendation.  TfL seems quite
nonchalant about ignoring the best practice recommendation.  In the
litigious US, that would get them sued.





 









From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

To: U.S. Metric Association
<[email protected]>

Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 8:48:52
PM

Subject: [USMA:46978] Where's the
common sense in this??



Let's hope when the USA finally
converts to metric that we do a more sensible job than these folks are:



  http://metricviews.org.uk/2010/03/imperial-confusion-on-new-tunnel-signs/



They'll be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century eventually, but
in the meantime, money and time will be needlessly wasted dragging their feet
...



-- Ezra











 







Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now 









 







Not got a Hotmail account? Sign-up
now - Free

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Reply via email to